<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX developers drive Web innovation - what about the browser makers?</title>
	<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/25/ajax-developers-drive-web-innovation-what-about-the-browser-makers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fallon Massey</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/25/ajax-developers-drive-web-innovation-what-about-the-browser-makers/#comment-800</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/25/ajax-developers-drive-web-innovation-what-about-the-browser-makers/#comment-800</guid>
					<description>If browsers were made properly, AJAX wouldn't need so many different suppliers.  The fact is that AJAX needs to integral and seamless to browsers just the way GET &#38; POST are.

Then couple that with true browser surface control, and you eliminate a lot of what Flash &#38; SilverLight bring to the party, by giving it to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If browsers were made properly, AJAX wouldn&#8217;t need so many different suppliers.  The fact is that AJAX needs to integral and seamless to browsers just the way GET &amp; POST are.</p>
<p>Then couple that with true browser surface control, and you eliminate a lot of what Flash &amp; SilverLight bring to the party, by giving it to everyone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
