<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tango in Web services: Java and .NET 3.0 interoperability</title>
	<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Arun</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-376</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 06:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-376</guid>
					<description>Thanks Philip, I'm aware of that project. The real codename is "Project Tango" as mentioned above and on the main page of http://wsit.dev.java.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Philip, I&#8217;m aware of that project. The real codename is &#8220;Project Tango&#8221; as mentioned above and on the main page of <a href='http://wsit.dev.java.net.' rel='nofollow'>http://wsit.dev.java.net.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Filip</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-375</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-375</guid>
					<description>Cool, but it could use a different name. There is already an open-source Tango project for icons and color schemes.
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, but it could use a different name. There is already an open-source Tango project for icons and color schemes.<br />
Cheers!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arun</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-374</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-374</guid>
					<description>The first version of WSIT was focussed on achieving interoperability with the set of specifications supported by .NET 3.0. We are in the process of planning for the next version. Please send feedback to dev@wsit.dev.java.net if you'd like Business Activity to be supported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first version of WSIT was focussed on achieving interoperability with the set of specifications supported by .NET 3.0. We are in the process of planning for the next version. Please send feedback to <a href="mailto:dev@wsit.dev.java.net">dev@wsit.dev.java.net</a> if you&#8217;d like Business Activity to be supported.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Thomas</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-373</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/12/21/tango-in-web-services-java-and-net-30-interoperability/#comment-373</guid>
					<description>Why is the WS-Business Activity not included in your list of QoS specs while the other two components of WS-Transaction are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the WS-Business Activity not included in your list of QoS specs while the other two components of WS-Transaction are?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

