<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look at out-of-proc or RPC interop</title>
	<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Wayne Citrin</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>I'd consider JuggerNET a bridging product, since there is a separate CLR and JVM.  They do work in-process and communicate through JNI, but (unlike IKVM and Grasshopper) bytecode translation doesn't seem to be involved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d consider JuggerNET a bridging product, since there is a separate CLR and JVM.  They do work in-process and communicate through JNI, but (unlike IKVM and Grasshopper) bytecode translation doesn&#8217;t seem to be involved
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ted Neward</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Actually, there's another open-source project out there that the creator of IKVM explicitly references from his weblog, JaCIL (http://www.cs.rit.edu/~atg2335/project/), whihc does pretty much the same thing. Obviously IKVM is more mature, having been around longer, but there's no reason JaCIL couldn't get to the same level of support.

Or, as mentioned in other comments, there's Grasshopper or even Codemesh's JuggerNET (http://www.codemesh.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there&#8217;s another open-source project out there that the creator of IKVM explicitly references from his weblog, JaCIL (http://www.cs.rit.edu/~atg2335/project/), whihc does pretty much the same thing. Obviously IKVM is more mature, having been around longer, but there&#8217;s no reason JaCIL couldn&#8217;t get to the same level of support.</p>
<p>Or, as mentioned in other comments, there&#8217;s Grasshopper or even Codemesh&#8217;s JuggerNET (http://www.codemesh.com).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Balmos</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>Michael,

See Visual Mainwin for .Net. There's an old review of it here:

http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=VP_Mainsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>See Visual Mainwin for .Net. There&#8217;s an old review of it here:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=VP_Mainsoft' rel='nofollow'>http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=VP_Mainsoft</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blair</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>Michael go look at Mainsoft's Grasshopper product it does exactly what you are asking for. http://www.mainsoft.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael go look at Mainsoft&#8217;s Grasshopper product it does exactly what you are asking for. <a href='http://www.mainsoft.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.mainsoft.com/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grasshopper</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>yes, Grasshopper can take you from .Net to Java:
http://dev.mainsoft.com/Default.aspx?tabid=130</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, Grasshopper can take you from .Net to Java:<br />
<a href='http://dev.mainsoft.com/Default.aspx?tabid=130' rel='nofollow'>http://dev.mainsoft.com/Default.aspx?tabid=130</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Bushe</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>Darn - I thought this was going to go the other way around!  How about a Java engine that interprets .Net assemblies into Java?  Now that would be cool.  Anyone know of such a thing?  Interesting article anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn - I thought this was going to go the other way around!  How about a Java engine that interprets .Net assemblies into Java?  Now that would be cool.  Anyone know of such a thing?  Interesting article anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tommi</title>
		<link>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2006/11/08/a-look-at-out-of-proc-or-rpc-interop/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Looks like fun - although if IKVM is not fully compatible (and how should it be) with Java 5 VM, it might be difficult to start developing Java applications that run under .NET CLR with popular tools like Eclipse. Maybe in future we get a better bridging to either Eclipse or to IKVM that either translates code so that developer doesn't have to worry about what he/she is not supposed to do if this runs under IKVM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like fun - although if IKVM is not fully compatible (and how should it be) with Java 5 VM, it might be difficult to start developing Java applications that run under .NET CLR with popular tools like Eclipse. Maybe in future we get a better bridging to either Eclipse or to IKVM that either translates code so that developer doesn&#8217;t have to worry about what he/she is not supposed to do if this runs under IKVM.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
